Your service is teaching people what your brand means.
The way a dental team treated my child reminded me how much a brand can communicate before anyone explains what it stands for.
-p-1080.png)
The way a dental team treated my child reminded me how much a brand can communicate before anyone explains what it stands for.
Kiki BhaurStrategic Brand ConsultantAbout 12 minutes to read
-p-1080.png)
At a private dental practice with my child, the team made him feel welcome, played with him and took care of him in a way that stayed with me. Calling it good customer service is fair, but it does not quite explain why it mattered. I was watching how the business treated someone I care about, and that affected my own experience and what I associated with the practice. Their care was something I could recognise through what they did, without anyone needing to tell me it was part of the brand.
I cannot tell you whether the practice had deliberately designed that encounter around a brand strategy. The staff may simply have been thoughtful people doing their jobs well. I also cannot claim to know what my child will remember years from now. What I can say is that their behaviour gave me a reason to think differently about the business. That is a useful place to start a conversation about brand.
Every business should deal honestly with people, do what it has agreed to do and put things right when it fails. Customers should not need to pay a premium for basic decency. But “give good service” is incomplete as a strategic instruction. It leaves the team to decide what good means in a particular situation and what that experience should help people understand about the business. A customer may need speed. Another may need reassurance. Someone else may value discretion, an explanation or the freedom to get something done without a conversation.
The useful question is what the service needs to achieve for that person, and how doing it well supports the brand you are trying to build. A firm that wants to be trusted for considered advice should make room for explanation and judgement. A business built around making everyday tasks easier should examine the work it leaves customers to do. A family-oriented service needs to consider the experience of the family, including people who are not booking or paying. The brand gives those choices a direction. Service gives people a chance to judge whether that direction means anything.
A business might say it is welcoming, thoughtful or dependable. Those words become easier to believe when someone encounters behaviour that supports them. Kevin Lane Keller’s work on customer-based brand equity places awareness and associations at the centre of how people know a brand. That provides a useful conceptual foundation for thinking about the beliefs an experience may build. It does not establish that any particular service gesture creates a measurable financial return. [1]
Berry, Carbone and Haeckel’s work on the total customer experience also directs attention to the many signals people encounter, including how the service works, its environment and human interaction. The implication is to examine the whole experience rather than isolate a pleasant moment. [2] My practical question is this: after the interaction, what does the person have real reason to believe about us?
“They were friendly” may be valuable. “They understood what was difficult for us and helped us through it” tells us more about the relationship between the service and the need.
Neither guarantees that the business is distinctive. Many competitors can be considerate. An experience can still strengthen a useful association when it is relevant, credible and consistently connected with your business.
This is the part of the dental visit I keep returning to. A child does not need to understand a positioning statement to experience how adults treat them. They can be given attention, an appropriate explanation, space, choice or a calmer environment. The response needs to suit that particular child and the circumstances. That makes the question powerful in settings involving children. Can the youngest person involved experience what we say we stand for?
If a business claims to care for families, where does that become evident to the child? Can they understand what is happening at a level appropriate to them? Are their needs noticed, or does the business deal entirely with the paying adult and hope the child stays quiet? For some children, play may be welcome. For others, a quiet interaction and less sensory stimulation may be more appropriate. A considerate experience needs room for both.
The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry’s guidance emphasises communication and approaches adapted to the individual child. That is relevant professional context for the example. Clinical decisions belong to qualified practitioners; a pleasant interaction alone is not evidence of clinical quality. [3] I would not turn the child question into a universal rule for every business. Complex services do not all need to be explainable to a small child, and many brands have no reason to involve children at all. The wider principle travels further: the intended value should be evident to the person experiencing it. It should not depend entirely on the business explaining how thoughtful it is.
The person who pays is not always the only person whose experience matters. In the dental example, my child was experiencing the interaction while I was also responding to how he was treated. Those experiences were related without being identical. Research by Lugosi and colleagues on parents and carers in hospitality settings found that responding to children’s needs could improve the experience of their carers too. It is a qualitative study in foodservice settings, not a test of my dental visit or a calculation of its commercial effect. It nevertheless supports taking the family experience seriously. [4]
That suggests useful questions for other businesses. Who is involved in the situation? Who may be carrying a concern the normal process overlooks? Whose treatment will influence how someone else judges the business? A hotel may need to consider the family arriving tired, rather than only the person whose name is on the booking. A professional-services firm may need to consider the junior colleague expected to use its work, as well as the director who commissioned it. These are illustrative possibilities to investigate, not findings that apply identically across sectors.
The purpose is to understand the real situation more fully. Children deserve consideration in their own right. Their experience should not become a prop for impressing the parent.

Start with a small number of associations that matter to your commercial position and that the business can credibly deliver. For a family-oriented dental practice, a possible intention might be that families feel understood and able to approach care with greater confidence. That is an illustrative brand direction, not a description of the practice’s actual strategy. Then examine the moments that could make the intention believable.
Scroll sideways to read the whole table
| Moment | Question worth asking | An illustrative service response | Belief it could support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before the visit | What would help this family prepare? | Useful practical information and an appropriate way to share needs | They help us know what to expect |
| Arrival | Who needs to feel recognised? | Welcome the child as well as the adult, adapting to their response | My child is included here |
| Unfamiliar activity | What can be explained, and by whom? | The qualified team uses age-appropriate communication within professional guidance | They take understanding seriously |
| Waiting or delay | What uncertainty could we reduce? | Explain what is happening and offer feasible choices | They respect our time and situation |
| Leaving | What should be clear before we go? | Confirm the next step and check understanding | They help us move forward with confidence |
| A problem | How do we remain accountable? | A reachable person owns the issue and explains the next action | They take responsibility when things are difficult |
These responses should improve the actual experience. They should not become a collection of gestures performed for a review. Nor does every useful action need to be unique. Returning a call may be basic. Doing it reliably can still support a reputation for dependability. The strategic work is choosing what matters, making it coherent with the offer and ensuring the business can keep doing it.
It is easy to admire an excellent employee and leave the experience dependent on whether that person is working that day. If the behaviour matters to the brand, look at what makes it possible: enough time, appropriate resources and the authority to solve a problem without sending the customer around another loop. Agree useful standards and examples, while giving people enough discretion to respond to the situation in front of them. Staffing, workload and handovers all affect whether the promise holds on an ordinary busy day.

This is how a strong encounter can become a more dependable part of the brand. The aim is consistency in care and responsibility, with flexibility in how people respond. A script cannot anticipate every family, client or situation. A good principle, understood by someone with the time and authority to act, can be more useful.
It is tempting to write that customer service is disappearing and everything is getting worse. That would overstate the current evidence. The July 2026 UK Customer Satisfaction Index scored 78.3 out of 100, up one point on the previous July. Improvement had slowed, but the latest result does not support a claim of continuous decline across the UK. [5] There is still an important question about how businesses pursue efficiency. When success is defined only as fewer contacts, lower handling time or moving people away from staff, the service can lose something customers value.

A customer might need to speak to someone because their situation does not fit the form. Another may simply want an accurate answer or a quick way to change a booking. Those needs call for different responses. Digital service can be excellent. A useful reminder, an accessible booking system or an easy cancellation may show consideration by removing work. Making someone telephone to complete a straightforward task can create unnecessary effort. Equally, an automated loop that prevents someone reaching a person may communicate that the business values its own process more than their problem.
The Institute of Customer Service has warned against approaching AI primarily as cost reduction, arguing for a broader focus on effectiveness and the customer journey. That is a useful challenge to the way investment decisions are framed. [6] My position is to use digital tools to remove avoidable effort and preserve human judgement where it adds value. Measure whether people can achieve what they need, whether important exceptions are handled and what the experience makes them believe about the business.
Fewer contacts can be a good result when a problem has been prevented. They mean something different when a customer has given up trying to get help. The number alone does not tell you which happened.
A satisfaction score can tell you something about an encounter, but understanding what it contributes to the brand requires another conversation. Ask what stood out, what it made the person think about the business and how they would describe it to someone else, allowing an appropriate interval where that helps. Listen before offering words such as caring, premium or trustworthy, so you can hear whether people mention what you intended, something else valuable or an experience that contradicts the promise.

Where children are involved, use feedback appropriate to their age and circumstances. Do not assume a child’s memory from a parent’s report or pressure a family to provide a public story. Look at operational measures too, including resolution, repeated effort, waiting and accessibility. Examine repeat business, recommendation or other relevant commercial outcomes over time, while recognising that pricing, quality, availability and many other factors affect them. The proposed relationship is worth investigating: useful service may support a valued association, which may influence future consideration and choice. Each step needs evidence. A memorable moment is not a calculation of brand value.
Each step needs evidence
Useful service
Each step needs evidence
A valued association
Each step needs evidence
Future consideration and choice
Take one part of the experience and work through these questions.
The practical component for this article is loading.
For a relevant family setting, add one more question. Can the child experience the care in a way that suits them, without needing us to explain the brand to them? The team at the dental practice gave me a reason to associate the business with care through the way they treated my child. That stayed with me. For a business, the opportunity is to understand which experiences make its promise credible and support its people to deliver them well. Your service is already giving people an impression of the brand. Make it an impression the business has earned.
Back to topSources
End of article
Continue the thinking

AI and human connection12 min read
As more interactions become automated, where do personal attention, judgement and accountability make your business worth choosing, and where can technology help you deliver them?
Make the experience count
I can help connect the brand you want to build with the service, communication and evidence people encounter, working alongside the team and partners responsible for delivery.

Practical component
Take one part of your service and connect the experience people have with what they have reason to believe about the business.
You will leave with one service improvement card: a customer need, the association you intend, the operational change, an owner and a way of hearing back.
Your notes stay on this page and are not sent to Kiki. Save them as a PDF or print them before you leave, or nothing is kept.
Add the moments that make up this part of the service. Optional starting points are below; your own names are better.
Scroll the strip sideways. Rename, reorder or remove any moment.
Take the moment that matters most and make it operational.
Side by side: what you mean people to take away, and what the moments above actually give them reason to think.
Your reading of the gap, in your words. Nothing here is inferred for you.
One card that connects a customer need to an operational change and a way of hearing back.
Service improvement card
Built from the card, the priority moment and the strip. Edit it freely.
Want to work through this with Kiki?
Book a call with Kiki: kikibhaur.co/contactBring this page. It is a better starting point than a blank one.